Accountability

The incumbent record: obstruction, insider dealing, and a $4 billion poison pill

The IID Division 1 election is a referendum on institutional accountability. The incumbent's record speaks for itself.

The hypocrisy timeline

2017

Z-Global scandal exposed

Independent investigation reveals conflicts of interest, controversial BESS contracts, and procurement irregularities. Infrastructure costs socialized onto ratepayers.

2017-2024

Deferred maintenance crisis deepens

Core distribution network starved of capital. Transformers dating to the 1930s remain in service. Backlog grows to $1.3 billion.

Late 2024

Historic rate hike approved

Board implements the largest rate increase in IID history. Residential base rate: 11.69¢ to 19.76¢/kWh. Less than 60 days between study completion and approval.

Early 2025

Data center revenue rejected

Despite the developer proposing $30M/year in net IID revenue and fully self-funded infrastructure, IID demands $4 billion in prepaid fees. Developer calls it a "poison pill."

January 2026

Federal civil rights lawsuit filed

Case 3:26-cv-00128 filed in U.S. District Court. Alleges constitutional violations, antitrust abuse, and retaliation by municipal officials against the data center developer.

February 2026

City of Imperial's lawsuit dismissed

Superior Court rules the City of Imperial's 35-page, 121-paragraph complaint was "legally insufficient to state a cause of action." The data center's ministerial approval is validated.

March 2026

State Senate bills target data centers

Senator Padilla introduces SB 886 and SB 887 to retroactively strip ministerial approval from all data center projects. Bills pass key Senate committees.

The "greenmail" ecosystem

The obstruction of the data center is not just local politics. It follows a documented pattern of CEQA weaponization — where advocacy groups file environmental lawsuits to block projects, then drop them in exchange for massive confidential settlements.

The precedent

Comite Civico del Valle (CCV) demanded $83 million over 30 years as the condition for dropping a CEQA lawsuit against a lithium extraction project near the Salton Sea. The IVDC developers allege they face the same shakedown pattern.

Why it matters

While politicians and special interests demand $83 million financial shakedowns and engage in "sham litigation," working-class residents of Imperial County are being deprived of union wages, vital tax relief, and a cleaner environment.

Who is your IID Director really working for?

Vote for accountability on June 2nd.

Take Action